Tag Archives: zambrano

Case C-34/09 – Ruiz Zambrano

Outline of the ruling on Zambrano

In the case of Ruiz Zambrano (Case C-34/09 of the European Court of Judgement (ECJ) http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/EUECJ/2011/C3409.html), the court made the following ruling:

Article 20 TFEU is to be interpreted as meaning that it precludes a Member State from refusing a third country national upon whom his minor children, who are European Union citizens, are dependent, a right of residence in the Member State of residence and nationality of those children, and from refusing to grant a work permit to that third country national, in so far as such decisions deprive those children of the genuine enjoyment of the substance of the rights attaching to the status of European Union citizen.

Note that there are numerous articles to be found on Google in relation to this case. I list a few of the webpages here:

But there are many more interesting reads out there…

In addition to the above, The Home Office have a very clear responsibility to safeguard and promote the welfare of children under Section 55 – Borders, Citizenship and Immigration Act 2009. This guidance is laid out well in their Statutory guidance to the UK Border Agency (UKBA), which also refers to The Home Office: Every Child Matters.

Zambrano IDI’s and Article 8 Guidance

I’d like to also raise the following UN Law: UNCRC – United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child

And the consolidated clearer version in EU law:
Article 24 TFEU: The Rights of the Child.


Article 24. The *rights* of the child
1. Children shall have the right to such protection and care as is necessary for their well-being. They may express their views freely. Such views shall be taken into consideration on matters which concern them in accordance with their age and maturity.

2. In all actions relating to children, whether taken by public authorities or private institutions, the child’s best interests must be a primary consideration.

3. Every child shall have the right right to maintain on a regular basis a personal relationship and direct contact with both his or her parents, unless that is contrary to his or her interests. (Emphasis added)

Weighing this in line with the very clear Zambrano / Article 8 IDI’s. The Home Office Derivative Right’s guidance notice can be viewed here on my FOI request Derivative right of residence – take note that there are a number of files released on this request.

Zambrano Application

So, after months of trying, and no success.  I got a little frustrated.  Knowing about the pending rules for Legal Aid removing support for both family and immigration cases.  I made a post on the following website: Immigration Boards.com

I was given some info by Obie about Deriviate Residence under “Zambrano“.  I started to Google the term, and came up with no end of information on the “perceived” aspect and scope of Zambrano.

The particular thread that drew my attention was:

Along with the official UKBA website page:

I have made numerous Freedom of Information Requests on the subject, although most FOI requests to UKBA seem to go unanswered.

Here are a few that may be of use if you decide to apply via Zambrano:
Derivative Rights of Residence:

Section 55 of the Act: https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/section_55_of_the_immigration_ac#incoming-378061

Certificate of Application: https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/certificate_of_application_5#incoming-377004

Considering United Nations Rights of the Child: https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/considering_un_rights_of_the_chi#incoming-376909

I will post a further thread later on with a detailed list of “Evidence” to submit along with your claim.