Outline of the ruling on Zambrano
In the case of Ruiz Zambrano (Case C-34/09 of the European Court of Judgement (ECJ) http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/EUECJ/2011/C3409.html), the court made the following ruling:
Article 20 TFEU is to be interpreted as meaning that it precludes a Member State from refusing a third country national upon whom his minor children, who are European Union citizens, are dependent, a right of residence in the Member State of residence and nationality of those children, and from refusing to grant a work permit to that third country national, in so far as such decisions deprive those children of the genuine enjoyment of the substance of the rights attaching to the status of European Union citizen.
Note that there are numerous articles to be found on Google in relation to this case. I list a few of the webpages here:
- How Zambrano Has Been Incorporated Into the EEA Regulations
- Zambrano Considered
- Zambrano and McCarthy: What Are Their Effects?
But there are many more interesting reads out there…
In addition to the above, The Home Office have a very clear responsibility to safeguard and promote the welfare of children under Section 55 – Borders, Citizenship and Immigration Act 2009. This guidance is laid out well in their Statutory guidance to the UK Border Agency (UKBA), which also refers to The Home Office: Every Child Matters.
Zambrano IDI’s and Article 8 Guidance
I’d like to also raise the following UN Law: UNCRC – United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child
And the consolidated clearer version in EU law:
Article 24 TFEU: The Rights of the Child.
COMMENTARY OF THE CHARTER OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION
Article 24. The *rights* of the child
1. Children shall have the right to such protection and care as is necessary for their well-being. They may express their views freely. Such views shall be taken into consideration on matters which concern them in accordance with their age and maturity.
2. In all actions relating to children, whether taken by public authorities or private institutions, the child’s best interests must be a primary consideration.
3. Every child shall have the right right to maintain on a regular basis a personal relationship and direct contact with both his or her parents, unless that is contrary to his or her interests. (Emphasis added)
Weighing this in line with the very clear Zambrano / Article 8 IDI’s. The Home Office Derivative Right’s guidance notice can be viewed here on my FOI request Derivative right of residence – take note that there are a number of files released on this request.